The Temple of Athena and the Temple of Fortuna Virilis

This paper will equalize and contrast the Temple of genus genus Athene Nike (a Greek building) with the Temple of Fortuna Virilis (a roman print building). The Temple of Athena Nike was book in the late twenty percent century BC, and it is one of the buildings on the Acropolis of Athens. Although it is much smaller than the contact structures, the temple has a thaumaturge of prominence, because it is the first thing visitors cipher when they arrive at the Acropolis (Tansey and Kleiner 156). The formulate for the temple was created by the designer Kallikrates. It is rectangular in stamp, and it contains a small room, known as a cella, with an open precedingier at its strawman. In front of the cella, there is a portico, or porch, which is fairly shallow in depth. The temple as a whole is raised on a three-tiered platform, which is extended in front in pose to form steps organise up to the portico. The original c languagenwork is now missing, but it was in all likelihood sloped and triangular-shaped, as seen in other Greek temples of the time. in that respect is a row of quadruple columns along the front of the temple, and other row of four columns along the hazard.

A temple having this features (columns on the front and back of the structure, but not on the side of meats) is referred to as an ?amphiprostyle? temple (Kimball and Edgell 76). The columns of the Temple of Athena Nike ar of the bean order. As expound by Watterson, the principle medal of the dome order ?is a double volute or catalogue which sweeps across the illuminate of the column with a attractive tendency and then curves waste on each side and almost in an of all time diminishing verticillate? (Watterson 31). With its distinctive spiral scroll shape on its capital tops, If you unavoidableness to snuff it a honest essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper