Neuromancer The case against Microsoft is based not just on willful economics, but on a fundamental misunderstanding of governments decision-making contribution when it comes to market operations. This misunderstanding has led to an attack on one of the US?s most successful firms. It is difficult to billhook consumer harms, much less harms that may only occur in the future. A common misconception about antitrust law is that its design is to ensure fair competition. Thats not true; antitrust laws break up is to protect consumers.
If fair competition maximizes their eudaemonia, so be it; if monopoly maximiz es their well-being that?s what the antitrust laws provide for. Its not clear that Microsoft has a monopoly in the first place. Past Microsoft customers are not a captive market, as the Department of Justice portrays them. Rather, Microsoft must occupy to add features and functionality to its products to get its Windows 95 consumers to become Windows 98 (and beyond) consumers. Consumers a...If you indispensableness to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment