Ted Kaczynski, the UNABOMBER - An Ethical Case Study Essay -- Philosop

Ted Kaczynski, the UNABOMBER - An Ethical contingency Study The intent of this study is to determine exactly how much accountability Ted Kaczynski must accept for his actions as the UNABOMBER. The essential problem of the situation is that Kaczynski claims issue responsibility, but he has been ruled mentally ill by the State. He adamantly denies his illness, stating that social maladjustment, although technically a sickness, is distinct from an organic ground illness, and therefore within his realm of free allow. We will also wield the role his familiar and sister-in-law played in the tragedy, their motives, and the impact their pleas have brought to surrender on the dilemma. We will examine this ethology from an existentialist perspective, as this is the most applicable to Ted Kaczynski himself. Case Summary During an 18-year period as the UNABOMBER, Ted Kaczynski wounded 23 masses and killed 3 with pipe bombs. He is a vehement anarchist and Luddite who feels that oversocialization and applied science are destroying Man and strangling out any kind of freedom he may have ever possessed. According to section 114 of his manifesto, The arranging HAS TO regulate human behavior closely in order to die. Bureaucracies HAVE TO be run according to rigid rules. It is true that almost restrictions on our freedom could be eliminated, but GENERALLY SPEAKING the regulating of our lives by large organizations is necessary for the functioning of industrial-technological society. The result is a nose out of powerlessness on the part of the average person. It may be, however, that formal regulations will tend increasingly to be replaced by psychological tools that make us want to do what the system requires of us. Evidenc... ... Conclusions Existentially, David has made the dominant decision in the end, and the truly free decision. Ted, as do most martyrs (which is how he views himself) has elect to sacrifice his freedom by not ending his own life. proper(a) to die? He has it every day when he looks around him. If he leaves his right to die in someone elses hands, he accepts no responsibility and therefore does not truly exist as a free individual, and therefore does not have a right to die. The strengths of this feign are that there is an intrinsic master and slave this is also the weakness, because Ted denied the conception of the master in that all men were there own masters. unlike Ted, who claims to accept responsibility but actually denied it by denying the inequality of existence, his brother did accept the responsibility by choosing to exist in dominance.