Reflective report on your experience of the Myers Briggs Personality Essay

Reflective report on your experience of the Myers Briggs Personality Inventory - Essay ExampleThese staple fibre traits argon the precursor to the sixteen personality types which are essentially the combination of each of the typologies. As suggested by Jung the personality type do not put people in a box save rather show the inclination of the persons choices base on the typologies. It should be noted that as early as 1917 Katherine Briggs had already developed a way of describing the differences of accomplished individuals based on their biographies. However, when Jungs book Psychological events was translated into English in 1923, Katherine immediately devoured the book and studied it in detail since Jung went beyond what she initially conceptualized (Reinhold, 1997). Katherines daughter, Isabel Briggs-Myers, took over where her mother has left off and went on to construct the Myers-Briggs Type index number test in 1942 while apprenticing in a bank under(a) the tutelage of Ed ward N. Hay (Quenk, 2000). From the 1944 publication, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has undergone several revisions and improvement over the years to reflect the expanding understanding of the complex sympathetic behaviour. The close of these revision happened in 1998 under Mary McCaulley (McCaulley & Myers-Briggs, 1985). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is rooted on dichotomies of several human traits. ... The same can be said about Sensing vs. Intuition. Rationalising facts and tangible details may be true for most of the cases but there are instances most especially if there is ambiguity in the facts and figures presented that an individual has to rely on patterns and gut feel. When it comes to decision making, not all decision that go out be made by an individual relies on the objective and impersonal logic. There will definitely be instances when irrational blind belief will be relied upon. In conducting or performing something there are instances when an individual will pr efer to have plans over spontaneity. Having said the differences between the dichotomies, internal conflict that will be resolved as time goes on will clarify the actual preferences of the individual. Nonetheless, there is a tendency for humans to change their mind or even their pattern. Therefore the validity of the MBTI is always under scrutiny. The National Academy of Sciences committee reviewed data from over 20 MBTI research studies and concluded that the Introversion-Extroversion scale has passable construct validity (Psychometric Success, 2009). In the same article Robert Spillane, a professor of management at the potash alum school of Management at Macquarie University said that Test trivialize human behaviour assuming that untrue attitudes predict performance. Not only is this incorrect but testers offer no explanation for behaviour beyond the circular proposition that behaviour is caused by traits which are inferred from behaviour. The technical deficiencies of most per sonality tests have been cognise for many years. Yet they are conveniently ignored by those with vested interests in their continued use. Despite of actual criticisms, majority of organizations who conduct personality