Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective

Michaela Lawes SOUTH1A 11 Jacqui Godfrey Hypnotherapy &type A Counselling Skills Module 21850 words A individualised induction give ever so be more than(prenominal) effective. Discuss. Base your answer on theoretical concepts and techniques presented in class. If it is true that we all see the same thing but reckon it as different, if we respond to stimuli in a unique way, then a personalised induction would prove more effective. Would an anxious thickening respond to a linguistically passive feeler? Would a head and logically structured induction establish their trust and make them feel at ease?The Hypnotherapist impart seek to understand their client, interpreting both verbal and non-verbal signals. They will also acquire to contend with the way our brain interprets external information. Once the individuals personality is understood, there be a number of verbal techniques that the Hypnotherapist shtup utilise in order to get the topper results from the induction p rocess. It would appear that the personalised induction is effective but this perhaps depends on whether the Hypnotherapist has ascertained the true nature of their client.One atomic number 18a where the Hypnotherapist can start to understand the event of person they ar seeking to induce would be to ascertain the dominant modality within their client. Modalities are a classification of sensational perception. These are listed as optic, auditory, kinaesthetic, olfactory and gustatory. When a person is assimilating external information they will seek to disseminate that information using a dominant modality. There are many shipway in which they will reveal this through language, speech, gestures and even eye movements.NLP gurus Bandler and Grinder aptly call this the language of our minds. A person with a dominant visual modality will tend to part phrases that are littered with visual terms such as I see or The sky looks aqua If this persons eyes are looking up the right as they are explaining something to you they are creating a visual representation in their heads. Robert Dilts in his article Eye Movements and NLP states The most common application of eye positions in NLP is to determine the representational strategies a person is using in order to think or make a decision.Since many aspects of peoples thinking processes are unconscious to them, spontaneous eye movements can be an extremely central part of eliciting and modeling a persons inner strategies for decision making, learning, motivation, memory, etc. The eyes maybe a poetical window to the soul but they are also an infallible insight into an individuals dominant modality. Using these linguistic and visual clues the Hypnotherapist can begin to plug into to their client on his or her happy level. They can set ahead the trust of the client by appealing to their dominant modality.If the client had a dominant kinaesthetic modality they would have a more tactile and emotionally attuned pers onality, they would speak in a soft lower tone of voice than the fast talking, higher toned visual personality. Would there be conflict if the hypnotherapist used a quick thinking, highly imaginative visual approach to the tactile and feeling kinaesthetic? Perhaps yes, when one is trying to approaching the brain at an unconscious level, surely it would be more productive to be in harmony with your client in order to get the best therapeutic results.Josie Hadley and Carol Staudacher agree By using similar language and reinforcing the induction with certain kinds of images, you are making sure the subject can relate to the induction and feel an affinity for it Whilst using the dominant modality to gain an affinity with the client, the best results will come from gradually introducing language into an induction that will appeal to all of the senses. This technique is called compounding, and is a crucial tool in engendering a deep bewitchment.The client is organism invited to experien ce a linked drawing string of events during their induction that will encourage them to lose themselves in the scenarios being suggested by appealing to all of the senses. So whilst the client may, through their language, both verbal and non verbal, have the olfactory as their main modality, if they are subjected via the induction to visualize or imagine a taste then this will engage all of their senses for a more effective induction.This supposes that hypnotherapist has initially ascertained the dominant modality in order to gain the trust of their client and then proceeded to introduce a multi sensory screed that opposes the idea of a fully personalised induction. It is recognized that there are two types of hypnotic induction, namely, permissive and authoritarian. It is said that traditional hypnosis is generally authoritarian. The induction is cryptic and uses direct language and less creative imagery. This is a favourite style of the stage hypnotist as it lends itself favoura bly to the quick and direct nature of induction.A advocate of this technique was Dave Elman, whose authoritarian technique was used by doctors and dentists to calm their patients. It was quick and to the point. When thinking of the authoritarian style as a use for todays hypnotic induction, it would be suited to use with a nervous or anxious person. Perhaps the controlled style reassures the nervous client that the therapist is in control, they sack out what they are doing and therefore it will follow that they will be more inclined to follow the traces made by the therapist.Instead of you may start to feel your eyelids are becoming heavy the authoritarian approach will read as your eyelids are heavy The logical and concise nature of the language used in this type of induction is also a useful when presented with a skeptic of the science behind hypnosis, the style does away with too vivid imagery and curtails the use of metaphor, allowing a sense of logicality to the unconvinced. This direct style also lends itself well to addiction therapy as ascertaining their modality can be difficult delinquent to the personality and cerebral damage created by the addiction, for example, alcohol abuse. The repetitive and authoritarian style of induction Karle and Boys suggest the mere act or suggestion of an strain to give up, say, smoking will work whether personalised or not as they will respond well to any form of treatment, because any ritual will perform the functions they seek Again it would seem that a personalised induction is not so important in this type of case.The permissive approach is much more widely used in therapeutic hypnotherapy as it can play with linguistic metaphor and imagery based on the clients personality and dominant modality thus creating a much more personalised hypnotic experience. Michael Caroll in his essay The Structure of Permissive Hypnotherapy states sonority is an important aspect of permissive hypnotherapy because the hypnotherap ist is going to lead the client to trance rather than just direct the clients experience.To lead the client to trance the hypnotherapist mirrors the clients imaginative preferences through verbal communication allowing the hypnotherapist access to the physiology and state associated with trance, so when the client unconsciously follows the hypnotherapists lead he/she will be accessing a trance like state The leading hypnotherapist in this type of therapy was Milton H Erickson, he could be said to be the inventor of the personalised hypnotic experience. ringing building underpins this type of approach and this is what Erickson sought to gain in his sessions.The permissive style will use an indirect approach in order to gain the trust of their clients without appearing too authoritarian. Hypnotic suggestion is wrapped up in metaphor and creative language coupled with varying vocal tonality. It was Ericksons theory that people must participate in their therapy. The true meaning of a p ersonalised induction His screed would incorporate linguistic techniques in order to gain a rapport. There are several examples of this. Using the clients dominant modality (which are discussed earlier in this essay).Convincers which are used in such a way as to make the client think they are in control of their induction when in fact they are being indirectly guided into a trance. A convincer may read as this I can see that your eyes are beginning to close and you are relaxed. Anchoring a key-word that will bring a repeated response, for example, the client could be asked to feel the summer sun on their skin throughout the induction so as to induce feelings of warmth and contentment. This could change according to the dominant modality of the client, whether visual, kinaesthetic, olfactory and so on. Presuppositons and double binds are a clever way of allowing the client to feel in control of their destiny through contradictory linguistic signals. A client seeking to give up a bad employment may be told you may wish to give up x tomorrow, next week or next month when this happens is entirely up to you. This type of therapy works well as it allows the client to participate in their own induction. It allows for the uniqueness of the individual as to how they are induced which would surely be more effective.It would be too simplistic to argue that a personalised approach would be wholly effective as compared to a generic induction, but, in the main, it can offer a wide ranging approach for the therapist. In general, we use only a very small amount of verbal communication, much is achieved through soundbox language and non verbal signals. In hypnotherapy the hypnotist does not have these non verbal tools to hand in an induction and therefore has to rely on linguistic techniques such as modality, metpahor or tone of voice in order to get the most effective results for their client.The different techniques found within the personalised approach, such as the use o f modalities and indirect/direct language allows the client a proactive approach to his or her own induction. Michael Heap writes Regarding the legitimate therapeutic uses of hypnotherapy it is importantthat the therapists actions and communications be in keeping with context and should contribute to the creation of the appropriate expectations, thus maximizing the patients receptivity to suggestion.For example the therapist would have to take in acceptation the mannerisms of the client, even they way they are dressed and what they do for work and pleasure. They also have to consider that the client may not be behaving as they normally would due to nerves or the differences between their public and private persona. They may be performing or behaving differently than is normal. However the hypnotherapist will surely learn to gauge their approach as they gain more experience.There is a place for the generic and direct approach as discussed in the essay, but the effectiveness of getti ng the client themselves to participate in their own induction is surely a more enkindle and varied approach which lends itself to a more effective induction. References Hadley & Staudbacher Hypnosis for Change -1996, New Harbinger Publications, USA Heap & Dryden Hypnotherapy A Handbook 1991, Oxford University Press, UK Karle & Boys Hypnotherapy A Practical Handbook 1987 Free Association Books, UK